Navigant Research Blog

A Tumultuous Year for Demand Response

— January 6, 2015

Weatherman_webThe participation of demand response (DR) in the wholesale markets has been fairly stable for the last 5 years or so.  2014 blew those trends out of the water.

The year came in like a lion, with the polar vortex hitting the entire United States during the first week in January.  Virtually every region of the country activated DR resources during that freeze.  Overall, DR performed well, dispelling myths that it could not contribute to winter reliability.

The spring brought the annual forward capacity auctions for the 2017-2018 power year for ISO New England and PJM, which both showed lackluster results for DR.  In New England, while capacity prices doubled around the region, the amount of DR cleared capacity stayed flat from the prior year’s auction.  Meanwhile in PJM, while the capacity price in the eastern region stayed flat and the western price doubled compared to the prior year’s auction, DR cleared 10% less capacity than last year.

Legal Bombshell

Then the fireworks began.  Everyone in the industry had been waiting for a ruling from the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Order 745 from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on DR compensation in response to a challenge that was raised by the Electric Power Supply Association a couple years earlier.  The court dropped a bombshell by questioning the very jurisdiction of FERC over DR, and the entire DR community stopped in its tracks.

The rest of the year was consumed by appeals and writs and stays and various other legal maneuvers, with some parties trying to get the court’s decision to take immediate effect and others trying to delay it as long as possible and get the U.S. Supreme Court to take up the case.  As we enter 2015, the fate of the order is still in the balance, and probably will be until the spring, when the Supreme Court will likely decide whether to take up the case.

Meanwhile, Elsewhere …

Other accomplishments in the DR world have been overshadowed by the FERC 745 case.  Baltimore Gas and Electric unveiled the first default Peak Time Rebate program.  New York and California are undertaking large-scale utility transformation efforts.  Internationally, many markets in Europe are percolating with DR activity, and Asia is heating up as well, led by South Korea opening up its electricity market to DR in November.  Finally, merger and acquisition activity in the space has accelerated, with EnerNOC going on a buying spree and Constellation selling its DR business to Comverge to create CPower.  Many of the above topics, along with several other interesting developments, can be found in Navigant Research’s free white paper, Smart Grid: 10 Trends to Watch in 2015 and Beyond.

Will 2015 be equally eventful?  I certainly don’t expect a repeat of the polar vortex situation, so in that respect, DR should get a respite.  I do expect chaos on the regulatory front to continue, though, regardless of the outcome on Order 745.  The regional transmission organizations will likely continue to squeeze all resources, including DR, for higher reliability standards.  More states are expected to push for retail-level DR, both as a reaction to Order 745 and out of their own needs.  And the international arena is likely to expand strongly, providing a relief outlet for companies looking to diversify outside the United States.

 

CPower Reemerges as a Demand Response Player

— December 15, 2014

In October, I wrote about the announcement that Comverge and Constellation would combine their commercial and industrial demand response (DR) businesses into a standalone entity.  The questions were: What would the new company be called?  Would they take one of the existing names?  Combine the two names?  Come up with something new?  Instead, they brought back a familiar brand: CPower, the name of the DR provider that Constellation bought 4 years ago.

But this is not your mother’s CPower, according to Chris Cantone,  the company’s senior vice president of sales and marketing.  The C in CPower carries multiple meanings aside from the lingering brand recognition: the combination of Comverge and Constellation, customer engagement, and curtailment services.  “The market has been excited about the announcement, and our channel partners have been waiting for an independent DR provider,” Cantone told me in a phone interview.  The company is still in a little bit of stealth mode as the behind-the-scenes business combination unfurls, but expect a media splash in the near future.

Divide and Succeed

What value does this new structure bring to the parties involved? Cantone says that the future of DR will entail greater technical requirements, which were hard to fulfill under a larger organization like Constellation.  CPower can be more strategic and proactive on its own, while maintaining a preferred provider relationship with Constellation for its customers.  From Comverge’s perspective, there was a lack of synergy between its utility-focused residential business and its market-focused commercial and industrial business, so it made sense to split them up and allow them to build to their own strengths.

So was Constellation’s purchase of the original CPower 4 years ago a mistake?  No, asserts Cantone.  It was an invaluable experience for the old CPower DR experts to get immersed in the energy markets and learn how DR fits into the bigger picture on the wholesale side with generation and the retail side with customers’ energy procurement strategies.   Additionally, the 2011 deal was the move that set in motion the trend of larger energy entities investing in the DR realm, as Johnson Controls bought Energy Connect, Siemens bought Site Controls, Schneider bought Energy Pool (in Europe), and NRG bought Energy Curtailment Specialists.  Will those combinations survive?  Cantone thinks they will have to deal with the same issues that Constellation did, and we will have to see who can find internal solutions and who sets DR free.

The Real Threat

Regarding business strategy, the initial intent is to focus on the existing markets in the United States, like PJM, ERCOT, NYISO, ISO-NE, and California.  An expansion into utility programs could be the next growth step, followed by selective entry into the burgeoning international arena.

I contacted executives at EnerNOC to get their take on what looks to be their strongest competition, but they declined to comment .  In the meantime, EnerNOC and CPower may find common ground to combat the potential disruption from the court drama over FERC 745 to remove DR from the wholesale markets, which could affect them more than any amount of friendly competition could.

 

How EVs Can Aid the Smart Grid

— December 8, 2014

The plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs) available today can help grid operators manage the grid – although few in use actually do.  This is not too much of a problem now, but as more PEVs populate roads, utilities are likely to become increasingly concerned with managing and making use of these mobile assets.  Today’s PEVs represent a significant increase in residential electricity demand and, if unmanaged, could cause problems with distribution-level transformers and could drastically increase demand during peak hours when PEV owners return from work and plug in their vehicles.  The effect would force utilities to make upgrades to distribution networks that would likely be passed on in the form of higher rates to consumers.

Contrarily, PEVs also represent an increase in load that could be used to capture renewable electricity generation and help balance generation with demand, theoretically making electricity marginally cheaper and cleaner.

This latter scenario would likely decrease electric bills, as the utility would be able to provide more energy through the existing infrastructure, thus avoiding transformer capacity upgrades.  Most of the technologies to accomplish this process have already been developed, and multiple companies and organizations, such as GreenLots, PowerTech Labs, and the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), are busy testing respective platforms for future deployment.  However, to achieve such a paradigm, utilities need to develop demand response (DR) programs that are both simple and compelling to the consumer – not an easy task.

Thin Margins

A PEV owner’s understanding of why the charging of his or her car should be scheduled or managed by the utility is not fundamental to the owner’s participation in any given utility DR program.  However, the price at which the PEV owner will choose to participate in the program is.  In other words, the more money saved, the more PEV owners will be willing to participate.  Given that, there is a problem: driving on electricity is really cheap.

Most battery electric vehicles in use have an operating efficiency of around 3 miles/kWh, and the average residential electricity price in the United States is around $0.13/kWh.  This means that if the average electric vehicle is driven 1,000 miles in a month, energy costs will be slightly over $40.  This low energy cost means the actual savings from participation in a DR program would also be low and might not justify the investment from the utility or the energy aggregator for the smart charging infrastructure.

On the other hand, investment costs are zero for the PEV owner, as much of the necessary system elements already come standard on PEVs.  They will likely be low for utilities and/or energy aggregators depending on how many vehicles participate.  Additionally, the costs and savings equation will vary widely across the United States, based on a utility’s ability to balance the grid without PEVs.  The trick for utilities and energy aggregators will be to make DR compelling enough to attract future PEV owners who may be less tech-savvy than initial PEV adopters.

 

Eastern Approaches to Smart Grid Development

— November 20, 2014

Japan and South Korea have emerged as leaders in smart grid technology development and deployments.  On a recent trip to East Asia, I noted some similarities and some marked differences between the two countries’ approaches and styles.

At Korean Smart Grid Week in Seoul, I spoke about global demand response (DR) trends.  The Expo hall for the conference was as big as any I’ve seen, including large players like Korean Electric Company (KEPCO), Samsung, and LG exhibiting enormous booths and showing off cutting-edge technologies.  There were also a plethora of smaller companies and startups displaying their innovations to challenge the status quo and create the next-generation electric grid.

Next, I traveled to Jeju Island, the so-called “Hawaii of Korea.”  I got to enjoy the palm trees and volcanic landscape only by bus as we traveled to the Smart Grid Information Center, where KEPCO laid out its vision of the grid of the (not too distant) future.

Then we caught a quick ferry ride to tiny Gapa Island, which is only about 1 square mile in size but has an immense amount of solar, wind, and energy storage packed into a microgrid test bed, complete with a state-of-the-art operation center.

All of the Above

Next I embarked for Tokyo.  Japan is undertaking an “all of the above” energy strategy after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident in 2011.  Restarting the country’s nuclear plants is still on the table, but Japanese companies and government agencies are also deregulating the retail electricity market and designing opportunities for renewables, energy efficiency, DR, and energy storage.

Both countries, and the companies within them, have a laser focus on energy storage as a key solution, which is not surprising given their level of technological advancement.  Grid-scale energy storage is still a few years away in the United States, but Japanese and South Korean vendors are intent on leapfrogging Western suppliers and exporting their expertise.

Hare and Tortoise

The two countries’ business cultures, however, are quite divergent.  South Korean companies tend to take an aggressive, American-style approach to forming a plan, executing on it, and tweaking it along the way.  For instance, the country opened its DR market in November after a relatively short design phase, and U.S. provider EnerNOC has already entered the fray.

Japan, on the other hand, has been studying DR for a few years and it will take a couple more years of pilot programs until the market is ready.  Japanese firms tend to take a much more measured approach to development, trying to perfect the model before setting it free.  In the long term, both methods may work; but in the short term, the real action is in South Korea.

These developments are outlined in the new Navigant Research report, Demand Response for Commercial & Industrial Markets.  The report was actually published while I was abroad, so it includes updates from the trip.

 

Blog Articles

Most Recent

By Date

Tags

Clean Transportation, Electric Vehicles, Policy & Regulation, Renewable Energy, Smart Energy Practice, Smart Energy Program, Smart Grid Practice, Smart Transportation Practice, Smart Transportation Program, Utility Innovations

By Author


{"userID":"","pageName":"Demand Response","path":"\/tag\/demand-response","date":"1\/27\/2015"}