Navigant Research Blog

How Will the Developing World Help the Paris Climate Summit Reach Carbon Reduction Goals?

— November 30, 2015

With negotiators gathering in Paris Climate Summit this week, talks will likely be ruled by the need for mega projects of scale to help stem the rise in global temperatures linked to our deep addiction to fossil fuels. Though there is no doubt that developed economies such as Europe will need large offshore wind farms in the North Sea and equally massive solar farms in North Africa to reach existing targets, a much more interesting question is this: How can the developing world contribute, given the fiscal challenges facing the bottom of the pyramid populations?

Scaling Up

A quick answer: Through a major scaling up of both remote microgrids and nanogrids.

In a forthcoming report, Navigant Research forecasts the size for both of these off-grid networking platforms designed to increase renewable energy content for off-grid power. Ironically enough, it is here, in the deep jungles near the Equator or the frozen tundra of Siberia, where renewable energy resources such as solar and wind actually reduce energy costs.

It is estimated that over one-fifth of humankind lacks modern energy services. According to the United Nations, more than 95% of these potential customers live in Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia, with 78% residing in rural areas. While the cost of providing universal access to the electricity grid and decentralized electrification systems would be in the tens of billions of dollars annually, these costs also represent potential revenue to vendors of microgrid/nanogrid components such as distributed generation, energy storage, smart inverters, and smart meters.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that by 2020, developing countries will need to double their electrical power output. Demand for energy, especially electricity, is growing much more rapidly in these nascent economies than the rate of expansion of conventional electricity grids in the major industrialized world. All told, the developing nations are expected to represent 80% of total growth in energy production/consumption by the year 2035, according to IEA’s World Energy Outlook. Given the current economic conditions, one could safely assume that the majority of these new power supplies will be produced and distributed via remote microgrids, nanogrids, and other related forms of distributed energy resources rather than traditional hub-and-spoke centralized transmission grid infrastructure. This distributed approach is less risky and incremental, and syncs up with available trends in finance and business models related to power distribution in emerging economies.

Investment Needed

Just how much investment is needed to bring clean energy to the world’s poorest of the poor?

The African Development Bank, for example, aims to mobilize $55 billion in private funding under a New Deal on Energy for Africa program also designed to eliminate Africa’s energy deficit by 2025. Yet this number could underestimate the opportunity just for one continent, since it is based on providing minimal power for things like cell phones, LED lights, and laptops. Experience shows that once electricity is brought to a village, desire rapidly increases for more power.

In Africa alone, Navigant Research forecasts spending will reach more than $8 billion on remote nanogrids for village electrification by 2024. Ironically, it is these smaller systems that are expected to lead the market in Africa, rather than microgrids, due to their simplicity. They translate into not only big business, but a key tool to slow climate change in parts of the world that historically have not been considered major hotbeds for innovation. If we are to succeed in harnessing the power of new technology to slow climate change, I would argue it is in the developing world where that battle will be won—or lost.


Will One Company Conquer the Distributed Energy Space?

— November 25, 2015

I have often suggested that I don’t see any single company ever dominating the distributed energy space with networking platforms such as microgrids. My recent Leaderboard report, which ranks microgrid developers/integrators that offer their own distributed energy resource (DER) controls platform, underscores this point. All 15 companies that were ranked were, at the very least, contenders, with only three emerging as leaders according to the report’s criteria.

Some disagree. After this report was released, General Electric (GE) made a major announcement that raised some eyebrows, launching a new company called Current, an aggregation of existing business units currently valued at $1 billion. Jan Vrins, global energy practice leader here at Navigant, suggested in a recent blog that this move positions GE in a role of the network orchestrator, a business model that may prove to be the most profitable over the long term.

Current is designed to bundle previously disparate business lines offering LED lights, solar PV, energy storage, and electric vehicles into a single startup located within the walls of GE. Many in the industry are curious as to how this will play out, among them yours truly.

Whether talking about microgrids or virtual power plants (VPPs), the other significant development in the DER space is the approval of the merger between GE and Alstom Grid. Why? While GE’s broad suite of products relevant to the microgrid space is impressive, its control platform was not its strongest suit. By incorporating Alstom Grid’s controls, which are repurposed from its platforms used by numerous wholesale grid operators throughout the world, it now has a platform aimed at the VPP portion of the distributed energy value stream, migrating value from distribution level resources up to wholesale operations.

I see GE recent moves aligning more with VPPs—a network orchestrator business model—than microgrids. This is in spite of its major presence in New York, the hotbed for retooling utility business models to allow utilities a greater role with DER aggregation and optimization via community resilience microgrids. Since France, Germany, and Denmark in Europe are the current hotspots for VPPs, the GE-Alstom Grid merger is looking like a potential winner.

Yet there is plenty of competition. Navigant Research’s recently published report, our ninth edition of the Microgrid Deployment Tracker, for the first time tallies up identified microgrid capacity by vendor. Using that metric, ABB comes out on top. The bulk of these projects are remote microgrids in places such as Australia, islands off the coast of Spain, and in Alaska. The same update shows, nonetheless, if one tallies up total projects, it is Schneider Electric that rises to the top. Coincidentally, Schneider Electric ranked first in terms of the Leaderboard report, largely due to its partnership strategy on the controls questions, with firms as diverse as ETAP, Green Energy Corporation, and DONG Energy among its co-innovators.

One also has to admire the breadth of solutions being offered by Siemens. By offering a complete end-to-end solution for microgrids, including financing, and integrating this approach with the vision of smart city infrastructure, Siemens is echoing the idea that microgrids become a complete infrastructure package. The worlds of microgrids and VPPs come closer and closer together over time.

So, the bottom line? I don’t see any one company dominating the microgrid/VPP space anytime soon. GE’s recent moves will go a long way in strengthening its role in the DER space, but it has plenty of competition. Left unanswered at this point in time is whether the network orchestrator role will indeed unlock the revenue streams to allow large technology players to innovate in the increasingly crowded distributed energy market. It looks like GE wants to find out.


Nanogrids vs. Microgrids: Energy Storage a Winner in Both Cases

— October 21, 2015

The business case for nanogrids echoes many of the same arguments used on behalf of microgrids. These smaller, modular, and flexible distribution networks are the antithesis of the bigger is better, economies of scale thinking that has guided energy resource planning over much of the past century. Nanogrids take the notion of a bottom-up energy paradigm to extreme heights. In some cases, nanogrids help articulate a business case that is even more radical than a microgrid; in other cases; nanogrids can peacefully coexist with the status quo.

Despite the bad news here at home coming from NRG, which has now has spun off its distributed solar PV business due to lagging sales, I believe the linking of batteries to distributed solar PV systems is a game changer. The recently published Solar PV plus Energy Storage Nanogrids report shows that this technology represents a less than $1 billion market worldwide today, but this number is expected to grow to $14 billion by 2024, with residential customers leading the market. When it comes to resilience, states such as Massachusetts have already signaled their preference for building-level solar PV plus energy storage nanogrids, since they face less regulatory hurdles than community resilience microgrids.

Ironically enough, the potential loss of federal investment tax credits for solar PV in the United States as early as 2016 and growing utility opposition globally to traditional solar PV support mechanisms such as net metering and feed-in tariffs only help to build the business case for solar PV plus energy storage nanogrids. Why? In order to extract the greatest value from solar PV in the absence of subsidy—whether that be utility demand charge abatement or greater reliability and resilience—will require linking this variable distributed generation to an energy storage system, either in the context of a microgrid or a nanogrid.

The intermittency of solar PV, which can be more extreme than wind on a second-by-second basis, has long been viewed as a drawback to widespread deployment as a substitute for 24/7 fossil fuel generation. Rooftop solar PV in particular can feature capacity factors as low as 20%. If such small systems—whose primary advantage for residential applications is providing financial benefits (offsetting expensive peak grid power)—are coupled with energy storage systems, the value of solar energy is magnified. In essence, it can be stored and then discharged during time periods most advantageous to asset owner. These same storage systems can also offer resiliency benefits when the larger grid goes down.

While the decline in solar PV pricing has been underway for quite some time, it is only recently that batteries—particularly lithium ion—have begun to match solar PV with a similar downward momentum, thereby increasing the appeal of this technology pairing.

Average Installed ESS Cost by Technology, World Markets: 2015-2025

Peter SNANO Blog

 (Source: Navigant Research)

The most radical interpretation of this solar PV plus energy storage nanogrid vision is at the residential level, the application where the nanogrid model is likely to meet opposition from utilities—that is, unless utilities begin offering nanogrid services. So far, utilities in Ontario, Australia, and New Zealand are doing just this (Powerstream, Vector, and Ergon, respectively).

It is safe to say the size of the microgrid market is larger than that of nanogrid due to sheer scale. But microgrids also incorporate combined heat and power and wind, as well as other resources. If we narrowed the comparison to total capacity of just solar PV plus energy storage microgrids versus nanogrids, it is the smaller nanogrid that would likely come out on top today, and perhaps over the long term.


Pool of Innovators in Microgrid Space Is Diverse, Often Incomparable

— October 5, 2015

Navigant Research’s recently published Navigant Research Leaderboard Report: Microgrid Controls is our first ranking of companies active in the microgrid market. The hardest part of this examination of innovators in this space was leaving so many market movers out, due to the focus on microgrid controls offered up by either developers or system integrators.

What if we were to turn the general assumption for the Navigant Leaderboard format on its head? In other words, why not create an apples-to-oranges listing? I am going to go out on a limb and highlight three companies not included in the Navigant Leaderboard report, but that deserve special mention due to their near-term impacts on the overall global microgrid market, regardless of what their role is. I have previously highlighted two companies, a utility (Commonwealth Edison) and an energy storage and smart grid innovator (S&C Electric) that were not included in the Leaderboard. Both were disqualified for inclusion because the ranking excluded utilities and vendors that primarily focus on energy storage integration.

Here are three other companies not included in the Leaderboard that I would like to highlight, for reasons explained below:

  • Energizing Company: Based in the Los Angeles area, Energizing Company is poised to announce one of the largest grid-connected microgrids in the world. The company sees its role as akin to a movie producer. (Well, what do you expect from a company based near Hollywood?) It doesn’t offer a controls platform and, though a private developer, sees utilities as its primary clients. It seeks to sponsor microgrids utilizing public-private partnerships. The company has fully embraced the concept of utility distribution microgrids with a plan for a microgrid to encompass an entire municipal utility’s service territory, optimized with smart grid technologies. It helps that the community this microgrid will serve is allegedly one of the smartest communities in the world (and I am not talking about IQ, but embedded infrastructure intelligence).
  • PowerStream: Ontario’s second-largest municipal utility, PowerStream, was the first utility in North America to announce a microgrid offering under a business model it refers to as DBOOME—design, build, operate, maintain, and energize. Perhaps the company’s most forward-looking project straddles what Navigant Research would identify as either a series of nanogrids or decentralized virtual power plants. Working with Sunverge—another company Navigant Research views as a microgrid leader—PowerStream will aggregate solar PV and lithium ion battery systems installed in residences in order to provide bidirectional value for customer and utility alike. The utility requires each customer to pony up some of their own money in return for long-term savings and exchanges of bidirectional energy services that serve both residence and utility grid.
  • Win Inertia: Among energy storage vendors active in the marketplace, Win Inertia is one of the most creative. Based in Spain, the company’s project portfolio highlights fascinating applications for hybrid battery solutions, including both alternating current and direct current (AC and DC) systems for electric vehicle (EV) charging, railways, harbors, buildings, islands or renewable integration for, of course, microgrids. Win Inertia has enjoyed 100% revenue growth since its inception and boasts a portfolio of over 15 microgrid-related projects either in operation or under development.

At last count, Navigant Research has profiled more than 50 active companies in the microgrid market, with none of them capturing more than 10% of the total market revenue. This is the status of the market today: there is no clear leader. The three companies profiled on this blog highlight the fact that innovation is coming from a variety of market players, each focused on a different part of the value chain.

Will one company emerge as the clear market leader? Only time will tell.


Blog Articles

Most Recent

By Date


Clean Transportation, Electric Vehicles, Finance & Investing, Policy & Regulation, Renewable Energy, Smart Energy Practice, Smart Energy Program, Smart Transportation Practice, Smart Transportation Program, Utility Innovations

By Author