Navigant Research Blog

New York Details Its Energy Vision

— August 27, 2014

The New York State Public Service Commission (PSC) has released its latest straw proposal on its Reforming the Energy Vision (REV) proceeding.  It includes recommendations that incumbent utilities take on the central Distributed System Platform (DSP) role, at least in the short term.  This was one of the most controversial issues in the REV plan, with the potential for the utilities to be stripped of many of their responsibilities by the PSC and replaced by a new independent entity.  PSC staff decided to stick with the utilities – partly for substantive reasons, partly out of expediency.

The paper includes a table comparing the roles of a utility versus a DSP, exhibiting a great deal of overlap.  So the utilities can breathe a major sigh of relief with that recommendation, knowing that they will maintain many pivotal duties.  But the paper does point out that utilities do not currently have all of the capabilities and competencies needed to successfully operate the DSP and will need to hire new staff with different skill sets, as outlined in my earlier blog on utility hiring trends.

Seeking Alignment

Also noteworthy, from the standpoint of demand response (DR) and distributed energy resources (DER), is the recommendation that all utilities be required to develop DR tariffs, including fees for storage and energy efficiency.  PSC staffers are wary about the potential effects of the pending U.S. Circuit Court case on Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Order 745 on DR compensation, which could complicate DR participation in wholesale markets like the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO).  On the other hand, the report is rather light on recommendations for expanding time-of-use rate structures, which may also encourage increased DR participation.

Addressing the concern about a lack of coordination between retail and wholesale markets, the report states that market rules allowing DER participation in both markets must be aligned to ensure that DER interaction is efficient and properly valued.  The PSC argues that this goal can be accomplished with DSPs acting as aggregators in NYISO programs.  That’s a threatening statement to the third-party DR aggregators that would not want the utility/ DSP to compete with them in the wholesale markets.

Are Smart Meters Necessary?

From the consumer perspective, the report references a recent survey of residential electricity customers in New York that found that, although few customers say they are knowledgeable about their electricity usage, many place a high value on easy access to information regarding their energy use, the price of electricity, and methods for controlling their energy costs.  This indicates the potential for substantial increases in residential customer adoption of home energy management and DER products.

Notably absent from the REV plan is a recommendation regarding advanced metering infrastructure (AMI).  Electricity cost and rate increases are sticky political issues in New York currently, and PSC staff did not highlight AMI as a requirement for achieving REV goals.  The only reference to AMI actually speaks to how to avoid it: “To the extent that the cost of advanced metering equipment presents a barrier to customer adoption of DER programs or time variant pricing, utilities and market participants should consider alternatives to AMI technologies to enable program delivery.”  In other words, the report acknowledges that AMI functionality may be useful for REV purposes, but doesn’t say how that functionality can or should be achieved.

Comments on the straw proposal are sure to be plentiful from all sides.  I view this plan as less aggressive than the original REV paper, but ultimately, it is more achievable in the short term – which may help build momentum for the longer-term transformation.

 

New Federal Standard Mandates Physical Grid Security

— August 12, 2014

The North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) is currently drafting a physical security standard for approval by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).  This much needed proposed standard will eventually prescribe physical security for transmission stations and substations operating above 500 kV, and in some cases operating as low as 200 kV.  Say hello to NERC CIP-014-1.

The stated purpose of NERC CIP-014-1 is: “To identify and protect transmission stations and transmission substations, and their associated primary control centers, that if rendered inoperable or damaged as a result of a physical attack could result in widespread instability, uncontrolled separation, or cascading within an interconnection.”

CIP-014-1, or “Sip Fourteen,” requires each transmission operator to perform an initial physical security risk assessment and periodic subsequent physical risk assessments.  Effective security proceeds from a thorough risk assessment – this is the right starting place.  Each risk assessment then requires an audit by a third party.  The plan goes on to require operators to define risk mitigation plans, to have those plans audited by a third party, and to then implement the plan.  Finally, a third party must validate that the plan has been properly implemented.

Not So Wide

This sounds like a long, drawn-out process, but it’s the right pathway: assess the risk, plan the mitigation, and then execute the plan.  Each step audited by a non-affiliated third party.  Security done right.

The FERC liked NERC’s proposal except for one word: widespread.  Where the FERC had directed NERC to develop a plan that requires “identification of facilities whose loss could result in instability, uncontrolled separation, or cascading failures,” NERC modified the requirement to prevent widespread instability.  The FERC rejected this: “The term ‘widespread’ is undefined and could potentially render the Reliability Standard unenforceable or could lead to an inadequate level of reliability by omitting facilities that are critical to the reliable operation of the Bulk-Power System.”

In other words, the FERC is nervous that any given utility may choose to define widespread instability as a total global blackout, making anything less severe outside the scope of this standard.  There’s a precedent for this: the original deployment of NERC CIP standards resulted in 77% of U.S. utilities claiming that they had no critical cyber assets and were therefore automatically NERC CIP-compliant without taking any action.  It’s not exactly back to the drawing board for NERC, as the FERC praised much of NERC’s proposed standard, but it is one more go-round of comments, proposals, and approval.  And to the FERC: Good catch!

Plan B

One other much welcomed bit of goodness in the proposal is resiliency.  The FERC writes in its comments, “Resiliency is as, or even more, important than physical security given that physical security cannot protect against all possible attacks.”  Amen and hallelujah!  As we learned with the Metcalf Substation in April 2013, some kinetic attacks cannot be prevented.  But Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) had enough network resiliency in place that even the loss of a large substation resulted in not one outage.  PG&E knew: you can’t hold off all the attackers, but you can have a Plan B in place to deal with their damage.  And if that Plan B is automated, so much the better.

 

New Approaches Boost Energy Efficiency

— August 7, 2014

National Grid’s U.S. division has rolled out a home energy management (HEM) pilot in Massachusetts that combines free hardware and special applications in a bid to get customers to cut their electricity use and help the utility manage demand more efficiently.  The pilot is targeted at customers in Worcester, which, for the past few years, has been the focal point of National Grid’s testing of smart grid technologies, including new Itron smart meters and other infrastructure upgrades.

About 15,000 customers are eligible to take part in the pilot.  They can choose from several free bundles of technology.  One of the more novel devices is a digital picture frame made by Ceiva that receives electricity consumption data from a smart meter and makes suggestions for reducing use.  Smart thermostats from Carrier and smart electrical plugs from Safeplug are also available.  Ceiva’s software, called Homeview, enables customers to view consumption data online and on mobile devices.  For the utility, Ceiva’s Entryway software suite supports the management of smart meter-connected home area networks, residential demand response (DR) capabilities, and energy efficiency programs.  The pilot is scheduled to last about 2 years at a cost of $44 million.

Cheers All Around

A number of utilities are deploying similar technology to help customers reduce energy consumption.  Glendale Water & Power and San Diego Gas & Electric support Ceiva devices as part of their efforts to encourage customers to use electricity more efficiently.  In addition, utilities like NV Energy, using EcoFactor technology, and Oklahoma Gas & Electric, which has deployed thermostats from Energate and software from Silver Spring Networks, have taken the lead on HEM programs for several years (for a deeper dive into the HEM space, see Navigant Research’s report, Home Energy Management).

Utilities like National Grid and the others mentioned here are to be commended for providing a range of technologies that help customers reduce consumption while also helping utilities meet efficiency targets.  That’s what a smarter grid is intended to do, and more utilities should do the same.

 

Utilities Warm to Cloud-Based Smart Grid Analytics

— August 5, 2014

Managed services for smart grid applications — also known as smart grid as a service (SGaaS) — haven’t exactly lit a fire under utility executives.  Despite the numerous advantages to outsourcing non-core activities like communications, software applications, monitoring, etc., many large utilities, citing security, control, and economics, prefer to keep these functions in-house.

But as smart grid deployments extend beyond the largest utilities, it seems likely that organizations constrained by finances or personnel will be obliged to consider the SGaaS model if they want to take full advantage of smart grid technology.

Vendors are repackaging their solutions in a spectrum of managed offerings, from hosted to managed to full business process outsourcing.  And cloud service providers, including Amazon, Microsoft, and Google, are actively courting utilities’ business.

On July 14, Itron announced that it has selected Microsoft’s Azure cloud platform for its managed Itron Analytics solution.  Microsoft Azure will maintain the infrastructure, allowing Itron and its customers to focus on the analytics.  Itron says its analytics solutions can be installed locally, run by the utility in the cloud, or operated and managed as part of Itron’s Total Services.

The Whole Enchilada

Itron’s Total Services boxes up the metering, communications, and meter data management, along with analytics, in a fully managed offering.  In other words, Itron will not only turn the knobs, but will also respond to the information coming in.  Texas New Mexico Power (TNMP) in Lewisville, Texas engaged Itron to provide meter data analytics for its 230,000 meters earlier this year.

TNMP told me that “a smart meter can trigger hundreds of alarms; our staff may not have the expertise to best respond, whereas Itron’s analysts do have that proficiency.”  TNMP is also working with ABB’s Ventyx unit for an outage management system (OMS) that will be hosted and administered by Ventyx.

Hefty Growth Ahead

Navigant Research’s report, Smart Grid as a Service, forecasts that the SGaaS market will grow strongly over the next decade.  Our forecast includes a host of managed services for utilities, including home energy management, advanced metering infrastructure (AMI), distribution and substation automation communications, asset management and condition monitoring, demand response, and software solutions and analytics.  We expect to see a $1.7 billion market in 2014 growing to more than $11 billion in 2023.  Software solutions and analytics sold under a software as a service (SaaS) model are the largest category of SGaaS spending today, followed by AMI managed services.

Annual SGaaS Revenue by Category, World Markets: 2014-2023

 

(Source: Navigant Research)

Challenges to the model do remain, however.  Most notably, the rate of return model that most investor-owned utilities work under encourages them to make their own capital and personnel investments.  But for smaller utilities (e.g., cooperatives and municipals here in the United States), the speed with which solutions can be deployed, and the absence of large upfront investment, will be attractive.

 

Blog Articles

Most Recent

By Date

Tags

Clean Transportation, Electric Vehicles, Energy Storage, Policy & Regulation, Renewable Energy, Smart Energy Practice, Smart Energy Program, Smart Grid Practice, Smart Transportation Practice, Utility Innovations

By Author


{"userID":"","pageName":"Smart Utilities Program","path":"\/tag\/smart-utilities-program","date":"9\/2\/2014"}