3Q 2016

Navigant Research Leaderboard Report: Utility-Scale Energy Storage Systems Integrators

Assessment of Strategy and Execution for 14 Energy Storage Systems Integrators

As the energy storage industry continues developing, the role of the systems integrator is becoming more and more important. Integrators are responsible for maximizing the value of a system by enabling all available revenue streams to be captured, ensuring constant availability, and maximizing system life. Energy storage systems (ESSs) will increasingly be asked to serve different applications—ranging from short-duration and high-power ancillary services to long-duration time shifting of energy. Systems integrators are responsible for managing this complexity by designing systems that can provide the maximum value to both the grid and the system owners.

An emerging trend in the utility-scale energy storage systems integration (ESSI) space is the growing diversity of the backgrounds of leading players. This study covers companies with backgrounds in renewable project development, utility ownership, electrical grid equipment and services, battery manufacturing, civil and electrical engineering services, and innovative energy management systems. Systems integrators emerging as Leaders have leveraged their backgrounds to provide a range of flexible solutions that include full turnkey project development. Such a model allows for a more open approach to meeting the needs of various customers and is expected to allow a company’s business to scale rapidly.

This Navigant Research Leaderboard Report compares the strategy and execution of 14 leading energy storage systems integrators (ESSIs) focused specifically on the utility-scale market. These companies are rated on 12 criteria: vision; go-to-market strategy; partners; production strategy; technology; geographic reach; sales, marketing, and distribution; product performance; product quality and reliability; product portfolio; pricing; and staying power. Using Navigant Research’s proprietary Leaderboard methodology, vendors are profiled, rated, and ranked with the goal of providing industry participants with an objective assessment of these companies’ relative strengths and weaknesses in the global utility-scale ESSI market.

Top 10 Vendors:

1. AES Energy Storage

2. RES

3. S&C Electric

4. Siemens

5. NEC Energy Solutions

6. Greensmith


8. Invenergy

9. GE Energy Storage

10. ABB

Pages 54
Tables | Charts | Figures 24

  • Who are the Leaders, Contenders, Challengers, and Followers in the utility-scale energy storage systems integration (ESSI) market?
  • Which energy storage systems integrators (ESSIs) are poised to scale?
  • How are the backgrounds of leading energy storage system (ESS) vendors affecting their offerings?
  • Which global ESSIs have differentiated offerings in the market?
  • What are the key differences between various ESSIs?
  • What are the different strategies used by different ESSIs?

  • Energy storage systems integrators (ESSIs)
  • Energy storage project developers
  • Battery OEMs
  • Energy management software vendors
  • Utilities
  • Engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) firms
  • Investor community

1. Executive Summary

1.1  Market Introduction

1.2  The Navigant Research Leaderboard Grid

2. Market Overview

2.1  Introduction

2.2  Market Overview

2.3  Market Drivers

2.4  Market Barriers

2.5  Market Trends

3. The Navigant Research Leaderboard

3.1  The Navigant Research Leaderboard Categories

3.1.1   Leaders

3.1.2   Contenders

3.1.3   Challengers


3.2  The Navigant Research Leaderboard Grid

4. Company Rankings

4.1  Leaders

4.1.1   AES Energy Storage

4.1.2   RES

4.2  Contenders

4.2.1   S&C Electric

4.2.2   Siemens

4.2.3   NEC Energy Solutions

4.2.4   Greensmith

4.2.5   LG CNS

4.2.6   Invenergy

4.2.7   GE Energy Storage

4.2.8   ABB

4.2.9   Younicos

4.2.10  NextEra Energy Resources

4.2.11  Leclanché

4.2.12  Doosan GridTech (1Energy Systems)

5. Acronym and Abbreviation List

6. Table of Contents

7. Table of Charts and Figures

8. Scope of Study, Sources and Methodology, Notes

8.1  Scope of Study

8.2  Sources and Methodology

8.2.1   Vendor Selection

8.2.2   Ratings Scale  Score Calculations

8.2.3   Criteria Definitions  Strategy  Execution

  • The Navigant Research Leaderboard Grid
  • Annual Installed Utility-Scale Energy Storage Revenue by Region, World Markets: 2016-2025
  • AES Energy Storage Strategy and Execution Scores
  • RES Strategy and Execution Scores
  • S&C Electric Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Siemens Strategy and Execution Scores
  • NEC Energy Solutions Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Greensmith Strategy and Execution Scores
  • LG CNS Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Invenergy Strategy and Execution Scores
  • GE Energy Storage Strategy and Execution Scores
  • ABB Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Younicos Strategy and Execution Scores
  • NextEra Energy Resources Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Leclanché Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Doosan GridTech (1Energy Systems) Strategy and Execution Scores
  • Energy Storage Value Chain: Upstream Segment
  • Energy Storage Value Chain: Downstream Segment

  • Systems Integrator Business Model Focus Areas
  • Annual Installed Utility-Scale Energy Storage Revenue by Region, World Markets: 2016-2025
  • The Navigant Research Leaderboard Overall Scores
  • Vendor Scores
  • Vendor Scores on Strategy Criteria
  • Vendor Scores on Execution Criteria

Choose a License Type

(1-5 users)

(Unlimited users)

$3,600 USD
$5,400 USD